This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Regulations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Thu Jun 27 22:47:24 CEST 2013
In message <51CC5148.902 at powerweb.de>, Frank Gadegast <ripe-anti-spam-wg at powerweb.de> wrote: >I personally would start at the other end and force Microsoft >legally to only have PCs connected to the Internet that >have an AntiVirus solution installed and running ... There is a simpler solution that nobody ever talks about because it is not politically viable. (Translation: Too many campaign contributors with too much money are against it.) Ths simple solution is just to withdraw the existing specific exemptions to product liability laws that allow Microsoft and other software vendors to ship dangerous crap to people and yet never get sued for doing so. (This is a special exemption that applies to essentially no other cate- gory of product.) Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Regulations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]