This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
andre
andre at ox.co.za
Wed Jun 26 16:37:22 CEST 2013
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 20:01:26 +0530 Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists at gmail.com> wrote: > Consider, if you will, a domain that has absolutely no "content", but > is the command and control for a fast flux botnet. Which has been > the case with both the latvian as well as austrian cctld cases. We have many domains that are ONLY used for email, some for DNS, etc. etc. (one client uses his domain just for MUD) -- So "content" should not even be mentioned / discussed... but there are so many valid points and if you are open/unbiased it is very hard to decide a firm opinion. For myself: we all become desperate as the fight against spam/abuse is sometimes a very difficult one as things are not always white and black but more than 50 shades of grey :)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]