[anti-abuse-wg] 2013-01 Discussion Period extended until 26 June 2013 (Openness about Policy Violations)

On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 05:53:07PM +0100, Brian Nisbet wrote:

> There has been very little discussion on the below and there is just 
> under a week remaining in the discussion phase. So, now is your time to 
> talk about it!

you asked for it.  The policy text needs a copy edit - "publicly
published" is confusingly confusing.

> >-rewording of the section 1.0

I believe this part makes sense, except that It doesn't clearly state
that the resolution time ought to be part of the statistics, as well.
I'm not convinced that we need a policy for this, though.

> >-new section 2.0 and consequent renumbering of the other sections

This part is worrying. First because it defers details to the implementation
and second because it suggests to give the reporting party unconditional
access to an unspecified level of detail.  What's the legitimate interest
of the reporting party in monitoring the progress?  What level of
detail is envisioned? Without that being specified (and available for
review) I do not support the progress of this proposal.

-Peter