This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Who owns 24.205.98.101?
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Who owns 24.205.98.101?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Who owns 24.205.98.101?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
peter h
peter at hk.ipsec.se
Tue Jun 25 15:37:57 CEST 2013
On Tuesday 25 June 2013 09.18, Olaf van der Spek wrote: > Hi, > > Whois seems to say it's Charter Communications, abuse at charter.net. > But if I mail them, they say: > > This email address is for reporting incidents of abuse coming from IP > addresses registered to Charter Communications. Abuse from IP addresses > not registered to Charter Communications should be directed to the > registered owners of the IP address in question. If the abuse "function" don't work i suggest that blocking this range will work. If and when charter decides that their customers should have full access they should start with a working abuse staff ( and some more ) Until then, we can manage without them. <snip> # # # > > From: Olaf van der Spek <olafvdspek at gmail.com> > To: abuse at charter.net > Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 09:11:38 +0200 > Subject: DDoS Attack from 24.205.98.101 > -- Peter Håkanson There's never money to do it right, but always money to do it again ... and again ... and again ... and again. ( Det är billigare att göra rätt. Det är dyrt att laga fel. )
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Who owns 24.205.98.101?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Who owns 24.205.98.101?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]