This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] central whois
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] central whois
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] central whois
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Frank Gadegast
ripe-anti-spam-wg at powerweb.de
Mon Jun 24 13:44:45 CEST 2013
Benedikt Stockebrand wrote: > Hi Suresh and list, > > > Please explain to me why providing an excessively easy-to-use abuse > interface won't cause such an increase in workload for the recipients of > that list that it becomes impossible to handle. Thats the wrong starting point. If some resource holder is not willing to reduce abuse coming from his networks, theres nothing we can do. And it will not harm him to pubish his abuse contact in a central space, hes not reding the abuse reports anyway ... If they ARE willing, but have a heavy workload with these abuse reports, whats about, if the resource holder is securing his networks to reduce the abuse ? This will reduce his work load and the mails he receive ASAP. And if theres no more abuse originating from his networks, he will not care, if his abuse address is beeing published at a central space. Once he maybe reaches a point, where he has no leaks in his networks anymore and is very happy to receive reports as quick as possible to close new security leaks ... Kind regards, Frank > > > Cheers, > > Benedikt >
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] central whois
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] central whois
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]