This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Authorities, or lack thereof
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Authorities, or lack thereof
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Authorities, or lack thereof
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Fri Jun 21 18:18:40 CEST 2013
Hi Nigel, On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 04:03:58PM +0000, Nigel Titley wrote: >Sorry to be pedantic, but the "membership" (usually understood to be >the members of the RIPE NCC) have no power over a WG. I think you may >mean the "community", which does. You're right of course, it's the community in Plenary. >And the WG chair who was fired (in Rome if I recall correctly) was >actually fired by his own WG, not the plenary. I wasn't at the meeting, just watching the stream. I thought it was taken to the Plenary, but ICBW. rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Authorities, or lack thereof
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Authorities, or lack thereof
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]