This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Erik Bais
erik at bais.name
Fri Jun 21 13:49:36 CEST 2013
>>> Of course in amongst all of this I would suspect if the resources were >>> handed out, there would be a lot of depeering and null routing going on >>> in relation to the poor, forced-to-spam, citizens of the Grand Duchy. :) >> >> Once again, based upon the available evidence, I would claim that it >> would in fact be improbable that any substantial amount of deppeering >> and/or null routing would occur, in practice. It is a classic "trajedy >> of the commons" problem, and no operator would wish to have to explain >> to its user base why they, end end lusers, can no longer send e-mail to >> their cousins in Grand Fenwick. > I'm not sure, Spamhaus were quite happy to block Latvia for a far > smaller reason. I think if it was a mandated activity for all citizens > the reaction of the international community might be interesting. > Brian For those that want to read up on what actually happened on that specific incident in Latvia (July/August 2010), have a read on the following open letter from CERT.lv https://cert.lv/uploads/uploads/OpenLetter.pdf Erik Bais
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]