This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] Automatic IP -> abuse email address mapping
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Automatic IP -> abuse email address mapping
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] central whois
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Frank Gadegast
ripe-anti-spam-wg at powerweb.de
Thu Jun 20 16:24:01 CEST 2013
Denis Walker wrote: > Dear Frank, Hi, > > The RIPE NCC already mirrors the other RIRs whois databases as well as > some routing registries like JPIRR and RADB. All this data is already > available with a single query and all in RIPE RPSL format. You do not > need to know which registry is the authoritative source for the > resource. That information is part of the response we return. But these queries are restricted, because they contain personal data. And its to MUCH information. > For RIPE data the abuse-c is being implemented so we will be able to > give answers to abuse contact requests for this data. The data we return > for the other RIRs contains pointers to their abuse contact details. Sure, but what do you return when asked for aother registries ? They dont have simply ONE place for the abuse contacts email address. So, you return "everything", what is not usefull for end users ... > This data also includes information from some of the NICs who may hold > the authoritative data. For example, querying a JPNIC address in the > APNIC database includes information from the JPNIC registry. > > For example (I have shortened some of the output here): You see ? Too much information ... A normal lookup looks like this: # whois.ripe 201.237.64.1 % This is the RIPE Database query service. % The objects are in RPSL format. % % The RIPE Database is subject to Terms and Conditions. % See http://www.ripe.net/db/support/db-terms-conditions.pdf % Note: this output has been filtered. % To receive output for a database update, use the "-B" flag. % Information related to '0.0.0.0 - 255.255.255.255' inetnum: 0.0.0.0 - 255.255.255.255 netname: IANA-BLK descr: The whole IPv4 address space country: EU # Country field is actually all countries in the world and not just EU countries org: ORG-IANA1-RIPE admin-c: IANA1-RIPE tech-c: IANA1-RIPE status: ALLOCATED UNSPECIFIED remarks: This object represents all IPv4 addresses. remarks: If you see this object as a result of a single IP query, it remarks: means that the IP address you are querying is not managed by remarks: the RIPE NCC but by one of the other five RIRs. It might remarks: also be an address that has been reserved by the IETF as part remarks: of a protocol or test range. remarks: You can find the whois server to query, or the remarks: IANA registry to query on this web page: remarks: http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space/ipv4-address-space.xml mnt-by: RIPE-NCC-HM-MNT mnt-lower: RIPE-NCC-HM-MNT mnt-routes: RIPE-NCC-RPSL-MNT source: RIPE # Filtered organisation: ORG-IANA1-RIPE org-name: Internet Assigned Numbers Authority org-type: IANA address: see http://www.iana.org remarks: The IANA allocates IP addresses and AS number blocks to RIRs remarks: see http://www.iana.org/ipaddress/ip-addresses.htm remarks: and http://www.iana.org/assignments/as-numbers admin-c: IANA1-RIPE tech-c: IANA1-RIPE mnt-ref: RIPE-NCC-HM-MNT mnt-by: RIPE-NCC-HM-MNT source: RIPE # Filtered role: Internet Assigned Numbers Authority address: see http://www.iana.org. admin-c: IANA1-RIPE tech-c: IANA1-RIPE nic-hdl: IANA1-RIPE remarks: For more information on IANA services remarks: go to IANA web site at http://www.iana.org. mnt-by: RIPE-NCC-MNT source: RIPE # Filtered % This query was served by the RIPE Database Query Service version 1.66.3 (WHOIS1) You see ? No information about the RIR. Its pointing to IANA ! Ok, lets ask IANA: # whois.ripe -h whois.iana.org 201.237.64.1 % IANA WHOIS server % for more information on IANA, visit http://www.iana.org % This query returned 1 object refer: whois.lacnic.net inetnum: 201.0.0.0 - 201.255.255.255 organisation: LACNIC status: ALLOCATED whois: whois.lacnic.net changed: 2003-04 source: IANA Ah, LACNIC .... Lets ask LACNIC: # whois.ripe -h whois.lacnic.net 201.237.64.1 % Joint Whois - whois.lacnic.net % This server accepts single ASN, IPv4 or IPv6 queries % LACNIC resource: whois.lacnic.net % Copyright LACNIC lacnic.net % The data below is provided for information purposes % and to assist persons in obtaining information about or % related to AS and IP numbers registrations % By submitting a whois query, you agree to use this data % only for lawful purposes. % 2013-06-20 11:22:08 (BRT -03:00) inetnum: 201.237.64/23 status: reallocated owner: NOSARA ownerid: CR-NOSA-LACNIC responsible: Desarrollo de la Red - ICE address: 10032, 1, 1 address: 1 - Liberia - country: CR phone: +506 1 22207465 [] owner-c: REJ tech-c: REJ abuse-c: REJ created: 20080828 changed: 20080828 inetnum-up: 201.237/16 nic-hdl: REJ person: Desarrollo de la Red - DDIBA e-mail: gspam at ICE.GO.CR address: 10032-1000 San Jos###Costa Rica, 10032, San Jos### address: 10032-100 - San Jos### cr country: CR phone: +506 20001123 [] created: 20041004 changed: 20120529 % whois.lacnic.net accepts only direct match queries. % Types of queries are: POCs, ownerid, CIDR blocks, IP % and AS numbers. Great, no abuse contact. Its just a handle with an email address. You can to explain this to an end user ... > $ whois -h whois.nic.ad.jp 134.180.0.0/16/e > > Network Information: > [Network Number] 134.180.0.0/16 > [Network Name] > [Organization] SANYO Information Technology Solutions > Co., Ltd. > [Administrative Contact] JP00018865 > [Technical Contact] JP00018865 > [Abuse] abuse at sannet.ne.jp > [Allocated Date] 2011/09/20 > [Last Update] 2011/09/20 14:50:42(JST) > > This shows the abuse contact from JPNIC as an attribute. > > $ whois -h whois.apnic.net 134.180.0.0/16 > > inetnum: 134.180.0.0 - 134.180.255.255 > netname: SANNET > descr: SANYO Information Technology Solutions Co., Ltd. > descr: 2-5-5, Keihan-Hondori, > descr: Moriguchi-shi,Osaka 570-8686, Japan > country: JP > admin-c: JNIC1-AP > tech-c: JNIC1-AP > status: ALLOCATED PORTABLE > remarks: Email address for spam or abuse complaints : > abuse at sannet.ne.jp > mnt-irt: IRT-JPNIC-JP > mnt-by: MAINT-JPNIC > mnt-lower: MAINT-JPNIC > changed: hostmaster at arin.net 19990719 > changed: hm-changed at apnic.net 20031111 > changed: hm-changed at apnic.net 20040926 > changed: hm-changed at apnic.net 20041214 > changed: ip-apnic at nic.ad.jp 20050406 > changed: hm-changed at apnic.net 20050407 > changed: ip-apnic at nic.ad.jp 20110920 > source: APNIC > > This shows the same abuse contact as a remarks: attribute > > $ whois -h whois.ripe.net --resource 134.180.0.0/16 > > inetnum: 134.180.0.0 - 134.180.255.255 > netname: SANNET > descr: SANYO Information Technology Solutions Co., Ltd. > descr: 2-5-5, Keihan-Hondori, > descr: Moriguchi-shi,Osaka 570-8686, Japan > country: JP > admin-c: DUMY-RIPE > tech-c: DUMY-RIPE > status: ALLOCATED PORTABLE > remarks: Email address for spam or abuse complaints : > abuse at sannet.ne.jp > mnt-irt: IRT-JPNIC-JP > mnt-by: MAINT-JPNIC > mnt-lower: MAINT-JPNIC > changed: unread at ripe.net 20000101 > source: APNIC-GRS > > So using the RIPE GRS also gives you the abuse contact from JPNIC for > this resource. > > For more details see the new RIPE Labs article next week. Again, too complicated, too much information. Not usefull for end users or admin, that are not familiar with all this. Kind regards, Frank > > Regards > Denis Walker > Business Analyst > RIPE NCC Database Team > > > On 20/06/2013 13:53, Frank Gadegast wrote: >> Denis Walker wrote: >>> Dear Frank, >> >> Hi Denis, >> >> Im not sure, if this coveres what I would like to have, >> simply because you have to know to wich RIR the network >> belongs first. >> >> Its quite complicated to >> - look the RIR up at whois.iana.org first, >> defny needed for ERX networks >> - make the whois at the RIR (and usally find, that >> it sub-deligated the whois to a another RIR like >> BRNIC or KRNIC >> - and end up wich 10 different output formats >> >> You cant explain that procedure to an end user ... >> >> But maybe I understood your interface wrong, and >> I can really enter an IP at the GRS service >> and get the abuse contact email addresses ... >> >> And I know through the expiriences with our normal >> customer users, that they simply do not report spam, >> because they have no single place to look it up, and >> then do not know, where they should send an abuse complaint >> to. >> >> Normal users are always quite puzzled, when you tell >> them about whois services, RIRs aso, they have >> no idea about it, simply because they never heard >> anything about RIPE, IANA aso ... >> Most dont even know, what an IP address is ... >> Its hard enough to tell them how to find the >> abusive IP in an mail header ... >> >> And thats why eople use services like SpamCop, >> they simply put the spam in a web form, and >> they do the rest (ok, not perfect, but handy >> anyway). >> >> iana should have such a central service ... >> >> >> Kind regards, Frank >> >>> >>> The RIPE NCC has a Global Resource Service (GRS) where you can perform >>> unlimited queries on operational data from all the 5 RIRs and all >>> responses are returned in RIPE RPSL format. You can script your queries >>> against the RIPE GRS using our API. >>> >>> I am, at this very moment, writing a new RIPE Labs article with all the >>> latest details and improvements we have made recently to this service. >>> We expect to publish this article next week. >>> >>> Regards >>> Denis Walker >>> Business Analyst >>> RIPE NCC Database Team >>> >>> On 20/06/2013 11:17, Frank Gadegast wrote: >>>> Olaf van der Spek wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I hope this is the right list for such a question. >>>>> How does one map an IP address to an abuse email address in an >>>>> automated >>>>> way? >>>>> I assume scripts exist, but I haven't found any. Does everyone roll >>>>> their own? >>>> >>>> There are no public script to my knowledge >>>> >>>> This kind of automatic mapping is quite complicated and >>>> mostly internal know-how of f.e. blacklists, that do >>>> automatic reporting. >>>> >>>> The steps to do it are something like this: >>>> >>>> - first you need to identify, wich RIR is responsible for the >>>> IP/netblock, this is tricky, because there more RIRs like >>>> only RIPE, ARIN, LACNIC, AFRNINIC and APNIC, that actually >>>> hold the information you need (f.e. KRNIC and BRNIC aso) and because >>>> there are early registration networks, that usally do not >>>> belong to the RIR you would expect >>>> - all whois interfaces at the RIRs are different, parsing is >>>> difficult, different options too and all have different regulations >>>> and fields with even dubled content >>>> - then there are limits, how many whois queries you can do >>>> >>>> We have a pearl-script doing all this with over >>>> 3000 lines of code, and this code has to be adjusted >>>> nearly every month ... >>>> >>>> It would be a dream, if this group could discuss >>>> a standard whois output format for all RIRs. >>>> And the final step could be a centralized whois, anybody >>>> could ask for the abuse contact covering the data >>>> of all RIRs. >>>> >>>> >>>> Kind regards, Frank >>>> Network Operation Center - PowerWeb >>>> -- >>>> MOTD: "have you enabled SSL on a website or mailbox today ?" >>>> -- >>>> PHADE Software - PowerWeb http://www.powerweb.de >>>> Inh. Dipl.-Inform. Frank Gadegast mailto:frank at powerweb.de >>>> Schinkelstrasse 17 fon: +49 33200 52920 >>>> 14558 Nuthetal OT Rehbruecke, Germany fax: +49 33200 52921 >>>> ====================================================================== >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Olaf >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > >
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Automatic IP -> abuse email address mapping
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] central whois
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]