This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
furio ercolessi
furio+as at spin.it
Wed Jun 19 23:53:17 CEST 2013
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 09:42:55PM +0100, Sascha Luck wrote: > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 07:55:48PM -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > > >What is RIPE going to do when Grand Fenwick starts _encouraging_ its > >citizens to spam, hack, and DDoS? > > Nothing. That is, nothing beyond making sure that the resource holder > is registered in the ripedb -which it does- and that there is a > contact to report abuse to -which it now also does-. > > What the resource holder does with these resources is between them and > their relevant legal authorities. http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-584#addressing-plan indicates that RIPENCC _wants_ to know. I would really like to know if an Assignment Request Form for a /19 with 'snowshoe spamming' indicated in the 'Purpose' field would be accepted by RIPENCC. If not, I would really like to know what, for instance, the gentlemen that control 91.90.192.0/19 told RIPENCC about the intended purpose, and whether their statements are compatible with the PTR records defined on that block. furio
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]