This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Wed Jun 19 13:12:09 CEST 2013
On Wednesday, June 19, 2013, furio ercolessi wrote: > My main point was in the second half of the post, and concerned > the meaning of "invalid resources", their long lifetime, the fact that > the current system is favoring people that lie about resource usage, > while in fact the opposite should be the case. > > This is correct - and actionable metrics should be straightforward to provide. What remains is policy proposals that are effective in getting such allocation requests denied and/or revoked. Which seems to be more of a can of worms here than in any other RIR. --srs -- --srs (iPad) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20130619/147d600d/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]