[anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website

As a thought experiment, if Furio were to remove LIRs from Eastern Europe,
in particular, Romania, from his list below, what would RIPE NCC's figures
fall to?

Most of those /14s are swipped and then re-swipped to a succession of shell
companies that appear to remain valid for the minimum possible duration -
and are typically (as creating a shell company in romania requires valid
ID) set up by the simple expedient of walking into a bar and paying a guy
there a few euro to get him to use his ID to set up the shell company.

So even "a much larger number of customers in the RIPE region" is a figure
that you would have to allow for substantial inflation in, when you
consider these numbers.

--srs

On Tuesday, June 18, 2013, Gert Doering wrote:

>
> > ARIN clearly has a serious problem too, but when the number of
> > problem is normalized with the allocation size we obtain (number
> > of problems per /8):
> >
> > AFRINIC ..... 0.31
> > APNIC ....... 0.35
> > ARIN ........ 3.44
> > LACNIC ...... 0.50
> > RIPENCC ..... 6.27
>
> I'm not sure what good is "normalizing by amount of /8s", as that is
> easily skewed by a few early and large allocations, of which ARIN has
> quite a lot.
>
> Normalizing by *number of LIRs* seems to be a much more interesting metric
> to see "what percentage of the LIRs under a given RIR umbrella are
> problematic".
>
>
>

-- 
--srs (iPad)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20130618/7b9ddadf/attachment.html>