[anti-abuse-wg] 2013-01 Discussion Period extended until 26 June 2013 (Openness about Policy Violations)

Hi Sander,

On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 10:08:44PM +0200, Sander Steffann wrote:
>> submission of complaints to the LIRportal , thereby ensuring that the
>> submitter is contractually obliged to the NCC and disclosure of this
>> information can be appropriately sanctioned. Such sanctions would
>> need to be enough to discourage abuse.
>
>I don't see any further role for the RIPE NCC here. Certainly not in
>regard to defining 'sanctions'. The RIPE NCC is not the police.

OK, forget about sanctions which, in any case, would only be related to
possible breach of contract. The identity of the complainant must be
known to, and verified by, the NCC though (LIRportal?) and discoverable
in case of abuse.
I don't want to leave room here for spurious complaints from
fake at address.com that the NCC would be obliged to act on.

>> I'd like to know more about the use-case for this, particularly under
>> the aspect of "automated processing"
>
>It just says that the file format will be published in a well defined
>and publicly known format. What exactly is your point here?

I'm just wondering whether there is any use for this information besides
idle curiosity. 

rgds,
Sascha