[anti-abuse-wg] Clarification Regarding Needs Assessment and Audits

The lack of progress is simply because you have very few people who are in
a security rather than IP admin or network ops role.  Security as in for a
seriously large provider.

The other lack of progress - well, changing entrenched policies, or
enforcing them beyond a point where the enforcer is reluctant to
investigate (or is it "play police" according to the local meme) is as
tough as it sounds.

On Friday, July 5, 2013, Frank Gadegast wrote:

> Sascha Luck wrote:
>
>  TTBOMK, as long as policy requirements are fulfilled
>> there is no mandate to revoke resources.
>>
>
> Any spammer on this list (think so, simply because
> of the lack of progress) ?
>
> * Im starting now a second carrier in renting all
> the IPv4 addresses left in our allocation exclusively
> to abusers and make a lot of money with it.
> Just make offers now. *
>
> Will surely put a working abuse contact email address
> in RIPEs db, that gets directed to /dev/null
> and have a correct postal address somewhere on
> a funny island ...
>
> And it looks like if nobody could ever do anything
> against it.
>
> The current regulations are simply slippery as
> an eel (like we say in Germany), no way
> to catch anybody responsible. Again, ridicolous ...
>
>
> Kind regards, Frank
> --
> PHADE Software - PowerWeb                       http://www.powerweb.de
> Inh. Dipl.-Inform. Frank Gadegast             mailto:frank at powerweb.de
> Schinkelstrasse 17                                fon: +49 33200 52920
> 14558 Nuthetal OT Rehbruecke, Germany             fax: +49 33200 52921
> ==============================**==============================**==========
>
>

-- 
--srs (iPad)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20130708/f51bb54a/attachment.html>