This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] Clarification Regarding Needs Assessment and Audits
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Clarification Regarding Needs Assessment and Audits
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Clarification Regarding Needs Assessment and Audits
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Peter Koch
pk at DENIC.DE
Thu Jul 4 19:36:09 CEST 2013
On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 05:31:25PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote: > No, because that situation can not happen. The LIR does not specify > a purpose, so there is no way they could be used for a "different purpose". in all fairness, Andrew's response made the 'purpose' compliance of the assignments subject to the evaluation in his response. Now, I'd appreciate a clarification from the NCC what level of abstraction they consider a 'purpose' in this sense. I'd be surprise to learn this is a website screening or any traffic assessment. I could, however, understand if this included a check of proper application of the assignment rules. To that extent, believe it or not, an assignee stating ''I'm gonna send lotsa mails'' has demonstrated more of a technical need than someone claiming they love and collect small prime numbers in IP addresses. -Peter
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Clarification Regarding Needs Assessment and Audits
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Clarification Regarding Needs Assessment and Audits
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]