This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] Notice: Fradulent RIPE ASNs
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Notice: Fradulent RIPE ASNs
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Notice: Fradulent RIPE ASNs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Tue Jan 15 01:50:37 CET 2013
Hi, > The last time a romanian I know checked, most of these appear to be set up with business registration that was valid at the time the netblocks were registered but mostly lapsed a year or so later. > > Almost as if someone in bucharest walks into a bar, pays people there a few euro in drinking money if they will let their ID get used to register a shell company that can then register for a /16 or larger netblock. Well, the allocations/assignments are only valid as long as the original criteria are still met. In this case it seems obvious that this is no longer the case as the entity for which they were requested no longer exists. But to be certain there has to be work done by the RIPE NCC. They can't just revoke resources because someone posted a message on a mailing list :-) Submitting this information to http://www.ripe.net/report-form seems appropriate. Cheers, Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Notice: Fradulent RIPE ASNs
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Notice: Fradulent RIPE ASNs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]