[anti-abuse-wg] [ncc-services-wg] 2013-01 New Policy Proposal (Openness about Policy Violations)

Hi Sascha,

>> I didn't really expect everyone to agree to the current text. But I did
>> not expect such language and comparisons on this list, and it shocked
>> me. As one of the proposers I ask you to please participate in a
>> constructive discussion here to see what is possible and desirable and
>> what is not.
> 
> if you were under the impression I was attacking you personally, I
> apologize, that was not my intent. [...]

Thanks. Let's start focussing on the proposal again :-)

> as for what is possible, I've thought more on it and have formend the
> opinion that the only thing out of it, I could accept, is publication
> of the fects if a complaint was upheld *and* resources removed for
> cause.

Your comment is still focused on one aspect of the draft text, but you haven't responded yet to any alternatives I proposed. The last one was the one I sent on Saturday:

I want to suggest the following direction for this proposal:
Change section 1 (1. Transparency on reported policy violations) to:
- RIPE NCC publishes statistics on complaints/reports (number of complaints in each state: new, under investigation, etc)
- RIPE NCC provides a way for the complainer and resource holder to see the progress, keeping the currently existing privacy options

And leave section 2 (2. Transparency on reclaimed resources) as it currently is. I haven't seen any objections to that part yet.

Please focus on this suggestion now. It is obvious that we are never getting consensus on the 'old' text :-)

Thanks,
Sander