This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] [ncc-services-wg] 2013-01 New Policy Proposal (Openness about Policy Violations)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [ncc-services-wg] 2013-01 New Policy Proposal(Openness about Policy Violations)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [ncc-services-wg] 2013-01 New Policy Proposal (Openness about Policy Violations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Brian Nisbet
brian.nisbet at heanet.ie
Sun Feb 17 17:23:50 CET 2013
Sascha, On 15/02/2013 22:38, Sascha Luck wrote: > > How would you feel if the cops published lists like: > > -Sander Stefann > > That sort of stuff sticks and never goes away even if it is subsequently > found to be bullshit. You are making your point quite clearly, there is no need to make comparisons like that, especially, as we all know, things have a way of being taken out of context and hanging around the Internet forever. > > Also, the identity of the submitter MUST be published even in this case. > No anonymity for snitches, the Stasi wasn't *that* long ago Equally, let's not make leaps like this either. Make your objections in a sensible, logical way, which I'm sure you're capable of doing, please. Brian Co-Chair, AA-WG
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [ncc-services-wg] 2013-01 New Policy Proposal(Openness about Policy Violations)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [ncc-services-wg] 2013-01 New Policy Proposal (Openness about Policy Violations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]