This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] [ncc-services-wg] 2013-01 New Policy Proposal (Openness about Policy Violations)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [ncc-services-wg] 2013-01 New Policy Proposal (Openness about Policy Violations)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [ncc-services-wg] 2013-01 New Policy Proposal (Openness about Policy Violations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Sat Feb 16 23:44:24 CET 2013
Hi all, >> Nope, no way, not unless a violation is determined - akin to being found >> guilty in a court of law. >> >> Also, the identity of the submitter MUST be published even in this case. >> No anonymity for snitches, the Stasi wasn't *that* long ago > > Ok, and this even more so. I am ending this thread right now. Ok, that was probably too strong. I do want this discussion to take place. I wrote this first version of the policy proposal for maximum openness. And I see the potential risks with openly publishing complaints. I want the community to determine where the limits are in regard to publishing complaints etc. I didn't really expect everyone to agree to the current text. But I did not expect such language and comparisons on this list, and it shocked me. As one of the proposers I ask you to please participate in a constructive discussion here to see what is possible and desirable and what is not. Thank you, Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [ncc-services-wg] 2013-01 New Policy Proposal (Openness about Policy Violations)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [ncc-services-wg] 2013-01 New Policy Proposal (Openness about Policy Violations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]