This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Allocation of number resources
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Allocation of number resources
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Allocation of number resources
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Thu Feb 7 13:20:29 CET 2013
Hi, On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 05:29:59PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > Well let us put it this way. > > The entities Ron's been thinking of have been doing this on the /15 scale > for quite a while now, so I do think they should have quite a few /16s on > the "use till it gets heavily blocked, get a new one from a RIPE LIR" > principle. If a LIR comes back for "more space", and cannot plausibly document that their existing space is full (80%), then the RIPE NCC won't give them extra space - so in the example of a /17 lying around mostly unused, the LIR would find itself in a pretty painful position. We *do* encourage making use of the addresses, we just don't go out of our ways to active reclaim possible-unused space. > Three weeks here, three weeks there and you're looking at the best part of > a year more at a conservative estimate. A /16 is just not that much space. A /8 would be interesting, but even *that* isn't "a year more" (and even "a year more" would be the wrong signal, namely "yeah, there's more IPv4" - which will just get people to roll out more IPv4-only stuff that will need to be touched later). > And I would be very interested to see just how much v6 space they have. > > Ron - noticed some? > > And please don't even tell me there's enough v6 space for everybody so we > needn't worry about IP allocation at all, that is what we all thought back > when class A, B and C addresses were being handed out, so we might as well > learn from our past experience as from anything else. I can do math (and learned that from experience). Can you? If a rogue LIR gets a fresh /29 every week, paying a full RIPE membership fee each time, RIPE's /12 will last about 2500 years. And then, there's about 500 more /12s inside FP 001, and *then*, we get about 6 more tries to make a more conservative IPv6 allocation policy. Should I care? Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 306 bytes Desc: not available URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20130207/ad585bdc/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Allocation of number resources
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Allocation of number resources
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]