This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 20, Issue 7
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 20, Issue 7
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Frank Gadegast
ripe-anti-spam-wg at powerweb.de
Sun Apr 28 17:23:02 CEST 2013
Karl-Josef Ziegler wrote: > On 28.04.2013 12:00, wrote anti-abuse-wg-request at ripe.net: > >> What provider is this ? Why do you hide their name ? > > May it be that the name of this provider begins with H and spamcop is > routing all abuse reports for this provider to /dev/null because this > provider only does forwarding (also to spammers) and nothing else? Good guess, your right with both. I used to lots of ISPs ignoring reports completely, some do really take care and fix holes pretty perfect and quick. But having an abuse address, policy and doing like, if they are good guys and then leaving it to the uneducated end user is really hypocritically and insincere, so I was pretty puzzled with this one ... Anyway, I dont want to talk bad about others, more interested in getting feedback, what will happen after everybody HAS an abuse address. Kind regards, Frank > > Best regards, > > - Karl-Josef > > >
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 20, Issue 7
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]