This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] abuse contact responsibilities
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] abuse contact responsibilities
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 20, Issue 7
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
peter h
peter at hk.ipsec.se
Sat Apr 27 17:47:30 CEST 2013
On Saturday 27 April 2013 12.17, Frank Gadegast wrote: > > Hi all, > > I like to raise questions about what kind of > responsibilities an abuse contact should have > and look forward for comments or experiences > you have with other providers. > > We currently have a case with a bigger hosting > company (mostly doing serverhousing) from the > RIPE region. They have one abuse contact with > one single abuse mailaddress for all IPs > and rather big netblocks used for serverhousing. What provider is this ? Why do you hide their name ? <snip> > > Kind regards, Frank > -- > PHADE Software - PowerWeb http://www.powerweb.de > Inh. Dipl.-Inform. Frank Gadegast mailto:frank at powerweb.de > Schinkelstrasse 17 fon: +49 33200 52920 > 14558 Nuthetal OT Rehbruecke, Germany fax: +49 33200 52921 > ====================================================================== > > -- Peter Håkanson There's never money to do it right, but always money to do it again ... and again ... and again ... and again. ( Det är billigare att göra rätt. Det är dyrt att laga fel. )
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] abuse contact responsibilities
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 20, Issue 7
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]