This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] abuse contact responsibilities
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] abuse contact responsibilities
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] abuse contact responsibilities
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Sat Apr 27 17:20:47 CEST 2013
Hi Frank, On Apr 27, 2013, at 3:17 am, Frank Gadegast <ripe-anti-spam-wg at powerweb.de> wrote: […] > I like to raise questions about what kind of > responsibilities an abuse contact should have > and look forward for comments or experiences > you have with other providers. Can you please define what you mean by responsibilities? Are you referring to some kind of contractually enforced minimum requirements or are you thinking of something closer to industry best practices? Thanks, Leo -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 4359 bytes Desc: not available URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20130427/f02921a8/attachment.p7s>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] abuse contact responsibilities
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] abuse contact responsibilities
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]