[anti-abuse-wg] IP Block wirh no contact details

On 23/09/2012 14:53, Karl-Josef Ziegler wrote:
> Hello!
>
> How is such a 'whois' handled by RIPE:
>
> inetnum:         84.22.127.40 - 84.22.127.47
>
> address:        Customer did not enter their own contact details yet
>
> see also:
>
> http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL99505
> 'Spammer & cybercriminal hosting (escalation)'
>
> http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL154878
> 'illegal pharma botnet spammer hosting'
>
> So this block seems to be used since October 2011 for cybercriminal
> activities and has no real contact details yet in whois database?

If you look at this assignment and it's parent allocation object and all 
the maintainers, they all point the "admin-c:" and "tech-c:" to self 
referencing ROLE objects with minimal contact details.

The only references to PERSON objects are in the ORGANISATION object 
referenced in the allocation object.

The issue of self referencing ROLE objects and if there should always be 
a PERSON object at the end of the chain of references was brought up 
very recently on this list. Currently the syntax and business rules 
allow this for any user input data. There was some discussion but no 
conclusion.

Regards
Denis Walker
Business Analyst
RIPE NCC Database Group

>
> Best regards,
>
> - Karl-Josef Ziegler
>
>
>
>
>
>
>