This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] abuse-c mandatory
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] abuse-c implementation schedule
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Fwd: NCC#2012103307 abuse-c
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Frank Altpeter
frank at altpeter.de
Mon Oct 22 10:23:08 CEST 2012
Moin, on 2012-10-22 at 10:10:26 CEST, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > Which, considering what nobody implies, is a lovely way to circumvent the > grand intentions this proposal has. Talk about leading horses to water > versus making them drink The last time I tried to update my handle, the auto-dbm told me that the field "abuse-c" is unknown and rejected the update. So I'm waiting for a notice that the technical details for using the abuse-c field is available. Mit freundlichen Grüßen Frank Altpeter -- FA-RIPE || http://www.altpeter.de/ || http://gplus.to/frank42 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 230 bytes Desc: not available URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20121022/fdf2bc79/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] abuse-c implementation schedule
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Fwd: NCC#2012103307 abuse-c
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]