This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Counterfeit shops pres follow-up
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Counterfeit shops pres follow-up
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 Proposal Accepted (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber
Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at
Tue Oct 9 14:31:17 CEST 2012
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > On Tuesday, October 9, 2012, Shane Kerr wrote: > > >>And I didn't see anything about limiting discussion or work to issues >>related to the RIPE NCC. >> >>I think that the working group is free to discuss anything the >>participants want to, as long as it is related to abuse on the >>Internet. >> >> > > Sure. I could think of a few other more relevant abuse focused forums to > raise this in, where you might actually see some good come out of sharing > the data. I agree. Like e.g. FIRST, as it obviously involves parties scattered around the world. > Perhaps not in a group of, by and large, people with IP > allocation / db / dns type backgrounds as opposed to security and abuse > mitigation. Correct. Although I think it is not a bad idea to get those people involved, too. It is a matter of expectation - and good will -, on both sides, I guess... > --srs Wilfried.
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Counterfeit shops pres follow-up
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 Proposal Accepted (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]