This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC's proposed implementation of Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE Database
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] RIPE NCC's proposed implementation of Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE Database
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC's proposed implementation of Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE Database
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Florian Weimer
fw at deneb.enyo.de
Thu Nov 15 21:05:33 CET 2012
* Kaveh Ranjbar: > Abuse handling is generally a role within an organisation and the > RIPE NCC is planning to model this relation in the RIPE Database. So > the "abuse-c:" attribute will be available in the ORGANISATION > object and should reference a ROLE object. When a ROLE object is > referenced from an ORGANISATION object by the "abuse-c:" attribute, > it must have an "abuse-mailbox:" attribute. Doesn't this invite mingling of allegedly privacy-relevant data and abuse contact information?
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] RIPE NCC's proposed implementation of Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE Database
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC's proposed implementation of Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE Database
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]