[anti-abuse-wg] Enabling community self-help?

Hi,

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:03:36PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Due diligence to know your customer norms accepted in most if not all the
> service provider industry is not "internet policing" and I'm certainly not
> going to block a country at my border routers.

If the customer is not doing anything illegal, their papers are in order
(contracts on paper arrive at the address given, and come back with 
a signature), and they are paying their fees, what else do you want to
see for due diligence?

So what?  Not accept customers/members because they don't wash, and smell bad?

I wonder when someone will show up and demands to reject LIRs that host 
content for adult entertainment...  because that's illegal in some states
in the world.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 306 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20120329/abf52b20/attachment.sig>