This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Enabling community self-help?
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Enabling community self-help?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Enabling community self-help?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Thu Mar 29 16:59:47 CEST 2012
Does the SOCA 5C model fail to meet your requirements for IP whois compared to domain whois? On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 8:28 PM, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote: > > > Or, let's phrase it differently. What do you expect the RIPE NCC to *do* > upon registration of a new LIR, if you all think that "check their company > registration papers with the company register to see that this is a > company in good standing in their home country" is not enough? > -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20120329/e94797cb/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Enabling community self-help?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Enabling community self-help?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]