[anti-abuse-wg] National PSDN "UZPAK"

SOCA's point is a lot simpler than this nit that's getting picked here.

"Company exists" (as a legal entity of some sort, registered somewhere)
isn't quite seen as a sufficient criterion and shouldn't be seen as the
sole criterion either.

IP address justification paperwork is easy enough to fudge - say all the
right things, copy and paste from boilerplate or whatever.   The RIR
certainly isn;t going to give you a /22 if you say you want to deploy
botnet C&Cs on it, so of course you aren't going to say that.

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Fearghas McKay <fearghas at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Just because SOCA finds it makes their life harder doesn't mean the whole
> commercial world has to change to make their lives a bit easier.
>
> Why do you find it disturbing that we can have different corporate
> structures ? All registered of course otherwise they would struggle to do
> business :-)




-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20120329/638d5384/attachment.html>