This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] National PSDN "UZPAK"
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] National PSDN "UZPAK"
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] National PSDN "UZPAK"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Florian Weimer
fw at deneb.enyo.de
Wed Mar 28 21:53:55 CEST 2012
* Fearghas McKay: > On 28 Mar 2012, at 18:57, Florian Weimer wrote: > >> Can RIPE NCC rely on the UK Register of Companies to validate requests >> which aim to establish a UK business as a LIR? >> >> SOCA seems to suggest that the answer is "no". This is disturbing. > > Well since you don't need to be a registered company to hold LIR > assets then that is hardly surprising that Companies House is not > the ultimate source of all knowledge in this case. True, but a signature from an officer of a registered company should be sufficient (together with the signup fee). If it's not, there's something seriously wrong with the registration procedure.
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] National PSDN "UZPAK"
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] National PSDN "UZPAK"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]