This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] National PSDN "UZPAK"
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] National PSDN "UZPAK"
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] National PSDN "UZPAK"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Florian Weimer
fw at deneb.enyo.de
Wed Mar 28 19:57:58 CEST 2012
* Suresh Ramasubramanian: > speaking of that, it would be interesting to see the response to soca's > proposed whois validation > > http://news.dot-nxt.com/2012/03/12/five-cs-whois-validation-model In essence, it boils down to this question: Can RIPE NCC rely on the UK Register of Companies to validate requests which aim to establish a UK business as a LIR? SOCA seems to suggest that the answer is "no". This is disturbing.
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] National PSDN "UZPAK"
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] National PSDN "UZPAK"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]