[anti-abuse-wg] Discussion on 2011-06

Brian Nisbet wrote:

Hello,

I still like to have mentoined that "Phase one: Implementing the policy" 
will include a new whois switch beeing introduced, that
will return the abuse-c's abuse-mailbox attribute for a given
IPv4/IPv6 addresses straight away and fall back to a result
from the abuse finder tool, if there is no abuse-c for this
address yet. The access to this whois query needs to be
unrestricted.

If the community thinks, that this should happen later,
Im also ok with it.

So: simply a +1 from me.


Kind regards, Frank

> Colleagues,
>
> Two weeks ago Emilio published the revised version of 2011-06 and the
> RIPE NCC Impact Analysis. I was hoping that this would answer some of
> the questions that were raised in the discussion phase and prompt
> further discussion of the proposal, but this hasn't happened.
>
> Could I ask the WG to take a look at the links:
>
> https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2011-06
>
> and the draft document at:
>
> https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2011-06/draft
>
> and see if there are remaining questions or things you would like to
> discuss so we can gauge reaction to 2011-06?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Brian.
>
>
>



-- 

Mit freundlichen Gruessen,
--
MOTD: "have you enabled SSL on a website or mailbox today ?"
--
PHADE Software - PowerWeb                       http://www.powerweb.de
Inh. Dipl.-Inform. Frank Gadegast             mailto:frank at powerweb.de
Schinkelstrasse 17                                fon: +49 33200 52920
14558 Nuthetal OT Rehbruecke, Germany             fax: +49 33200 52921
======================================================================