[anti-abuse-wg] meeting minutes

 >This is not the kind of language we will accept on this list, no 
matter how controversial and tough the discussion is.

Save your petty little personal attacks and temper tantrums for someone 
else.  The fact is people on this list harass and intimate people to the 
people no longer want to post.  A number of people personally attack me 
but you only complain when I respond in kind.

The fact is the posts speak for themselves.  The people running this 
group have shown that their intent is to cut out most of the Internet 
and make the decisions themselves.  Then they lie about it and claim a 
"consensus."  Several people have contacted me off list and indicated 
they agree to a certain extent with what I have been saying,  However, 
the people running this group have created an atmosphere where these 
people don't want to post publicly because they will be harassed and 
ridiculed.

It all boils down to this group is a bunch of bullies who are now 
throwing a temper tantrums because I am standing up to the group.  Just 
go back and look at some of the posts of how you are all arguing NOT to 
make it clear what the issue are that you are discussing.  It all boild 
down to simple concept, if someone reads minutes of a meeting they 
should be able to tell what was done at the meeting and what issues were 
discussed and voted upon and possibly why the vote was made.  In this 
case the minutes just reference some unnamed issues that aren't written 
down anywhere and it is not explained why they were deemed not important 
enough for some specific action to be taken.  (this is probably the 
number one complaint about ICANN and ICANN_related processes).  Then you 
all go around claiming a community "consensus."  You have turned this 
process into a joke.