[anti-abuse-wg] meeting minutes

 >clearly state the deficiencies you perceive instead of using terms 
like "cryptic" without substantiation.

It references issues brought up on the mailing list without listing 
those issues.  Someone would have to read through all the e-mails
to understand what the issues are and even then many people will have 
different perspectives of what the issues actually are.  The
issues need to be listed somewhere.  Maybe they shouldn't be in the the 
minutes, maybe a summary of the issues posted somewhere and a link
provided in the minutes.  In any case the issues should be spelled out 
somewhere in a summary of what the task force is trying to do.