This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] the mandatory abuse field
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] the mandatory abuse field
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] the mandatory abuse field
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Tue Jul 31 19:57:29 CEST 2012
Hi Frank, Frank Gadegast <ripe-anti-spam-wg at powerweb.de> wrote: [...] > An option could be the following: > the possibility to set the abuse-mailbox field to something like > "non-responsive", a predefined value, thats valid according > to the format of the field. The cleanup will happen, the resource owner > makes a decision and the reporter could see, that the > resource owner does not want to have reports (via email) ... That seems pretty reasonable to me. Regards, Leo Vegoda -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5488 bytes Desc: not available URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20120731/7cde5fe3/attachment.p7s>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] the mandatory abuse field
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] the mandatory abuse field
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]