[anti-abuse-wg] the mandatory abuse field

Leo Vegoda wrote:
> Hi Tobias,
>
> On Jul 31, 2012, at 6:33 am, Tobias Knecht <tk at abusix.com> wrote:
>
> […]
>
>> No. We had that conversations already and decided not to accept web
>> addresses only. The reason is, that automatic reporting can not be done
>> with web addresses.
>
> Assuming you mean something accessible over HTTP or HTTPS, it does not have to be accessed by a person using a browser. If there was a widely adopted API, I can see the value in a URL for some kind of RESTful service for automatic reports that do not require human involvement.
>

Another point for the abuse-c.
It can be enhanced.

An optional abuse-url field is really a good idea, if there would be an
standarized ARAPI (Abuse Report API ?)

> Regards,
>
> Leo Vegoda
>



Kind regards, Frank
--
MOTD: "have you enabled SSL on a website or mailbox today ?"
--
PHADE Software - PowerWeb                       http://www.powerweb.de
Inh. Dipl.-Inform. Frank Gadegast             mailto:frank at powerweb.de
Schinkelstrasse 17                                fon: +49 33200 52920
14558 Nuthetal OT Rehbruecke, Germany             fax: +49 33200 52921
======================================================================