This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] Legal concerns, was Manual vs automated reports
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Legal concerns, was Manual vs automated reports
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Legal concerns, was Manual vs automated reports
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ian Eiloart
iane at sussex.ac.uk
Mon Jul 30 12:55:09 CEST 2012
On 27 Jul 2012, at 05:45, lists at help.org wrote: > You don't need to be a lawyer to understand that once someone gives permission to publish data related to them then the privacy laws no longer apply to that situation. Actually, that's not true. What's required is "free consent". Free consent means that there are no conditions attached. So, for example, employers have to be very careful that they don't pressure (even accidentally) their employees. Given that many employees will never say no, it's almost impossible for employers to ask for *free* consent to anything. -- Ian Eiloart Postmaster, University of Sussex +44 (0) 1273 87-3148
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Legal concerns, was Manual vs automated reports
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Legal concerns, was Manual vs automated reports
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]