[anti-abuse-wg] the mandatory abuse field

They wild opinions are why this list is not a "consensus" of any sort.  
If someone has a certain opinion they are labeled as criminals, 
spammers, etc. without any legitimate reason.  This type of stuff comes 
from a religious belief and not anything that can be explained by logic.

I don't see why there is all this discussion of mandatory abuse fields 
when the RIR whois databases are filled with inaccuracies and false 
whois data.  When I point these out to ARIN I never hear back and it 
never gets fixed and I assume RIPE is the same way.  Until you take care 
of that problem it is useless to require mandatory fields of any sort.




>
> So, my personal summary is:
> ---
> Anybody, who is against a mandatory abuse field,
> is a professional spammer, abuser, maintains
> a bot net or sells open proxies or other services
> used for abusing others.
> They are criminals to my opinion.
>
> But thats only my impression ...
> ---