This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Legal concerns, was Manual vs automated reports
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Legal concerns, was Manual vs automated reports
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Legal concerns, was Manual vs automated reports
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
lists at help.org
lists at help.org
Fri Jul 27 06:54:36 CEST 2012
>Based on a definition of PII that does not regard IP addresses as personal data. A definition that, of course, does not make sense and is not true. You worked on an abuse desk and you traced IP addresses all the time so obvious you know better. Some people really live in some sort of fantasy land where common sense does not exist and even well-known facts are dismissed out-of-hand if it somehow affects your "religious beliefs." People are traced all the time by IP addresses. Whether a specifc IP address is PII depends upon the facts of the specific situation and you obviously don't have time to evaluate each specific situation if you are getting large number of abuse complaints. Under these circumstances you should probably treat all IP's as PII.
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Legal concerns, was Manual vs automated reports
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Legal concerns, was Manual vs automated reports
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]