This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Manual vs automated reports
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Manual vs automated reports
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Legal concerns, was Manual vs automated reports
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tobias Knecht
tk at abusix.com
Thu Jul 26 18:37:55 CEST 2012
Hi, > While making things clear is always meritorious, end users should be > encouraged to signal abuse to some reporting hub. They should prompt > their mailbox providers to implement such service, rather than doing > it themselves. In the words of RFC 6650: Don't get me wrong, this rfc is a good one an clarifies some things, but it is written by Americans under their understanding of US law. Some things that are mentioned are not possible under European Jurisdiction. For example providing Feedbackloops is especially in Germany a very critical task. So rfc 6650 is good but unfortunately does not fit all use and legal cases. In addition to that, I do not have any problem in single persons reporting abuse incidents as long as they are useful. And even people in the registration business sometimes do not know how to report correctly, which is not bad it's just that they haven never done it before and need somebody/something that guides them through, which should be one of the next tasks for this community to define. Thanks, Tobias
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Manual vs automated reports
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Legal concerns, was Manual vs automated reports
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]