This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] Manual vs automated reports
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Manual vs automated reports
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Manual vs automated reports
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michele Neylon :: Blacknight
michele at blacknight.ie
Wed Jul 25 15:32:32 CEST 2012
If they send reports to $random addresses they don't really deserve a response Mr. Michele Neylon Blacknight http://Blacknight.tel Via iPhone so excuse typos and brevity On 25 Jul 2012, at 13:21, "Thor Kottelin" <thor.kottelin at turvasana.com> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: anti-abuse-wg-bounces at ripe.net [mailto:anti-abuse-wg- >> bounces at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Tobias Knecht >> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 3:04 PM >> To: Alessandro Vesely; anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net > >> The point I would >> make >> here is, that there are techniques in place that can separate >> reports >> and that can proof authentication and that abuse departments can or >> should use them > > I agree, especially as many reporters anyhow seem to use every @-containing > string their Whois lookup returns. > > -- > Thor Kottelin > http://www.anta.net/ > > >
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Manual vs automated reports
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Manual vs automated reports
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]