[anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 5, Issue 13 RE: 1. Response from Dutch DPA (russ at consumer.net)

 > there will be no more response from me, as I can't help you further 
than refering you to the DPA and then it's up to the Commissioner.

The point is that the people who are claiming the privacy laws cover the 
information in the RIPE
database does not afford protection under EU laws are simply lying.  
People agreed to have the information
public so there is no protection.  Nobody wants to get an official 
ruling because they know it will point out
the false claims made that lead to the blocking.

It is interesting to note that the insiders on this list all say there 
is no support for my position *on this list* yet several
people have contacted me who agree with my position.  However, it 
appears they are afraid to post because they will
be ridiculed like I have been.  This is the atmosphere created by the 
insiders so why don't you just admit that there is no
"community consensus"?

Thank You