This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dan Luedtke
maildanrl at googlemail.com
Wed Jan 18 17:19:20 CET 2012
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:27 PM, U.Mutlu <security at mutluit.com> wrote: > I even would like to have several (2 or 3) abuse contact email addresses > as there are several kinds of abuses (spam with ads, spam with criminal > intent, > hacking attempts, flood attacks/(D)DoS, portscans, service attacks, > copyright infringement, impersonation, sockpuppetry, insult/discrimination, > ...), I like this kind of information to be embedded in the protocol/format used for reporting. There are already standards being worked on, or even used. This should not be part of the RIPE database itself. regards, danrl -- Dan Luedtke http://www.danrl.de
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]