[anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] RIPE NCC's proposed implementation of Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE Database

Dear Denis,

On 12/11/2012 12:21 PM, Denis Walker wrote:
> When a customer wants to handle abuse for their part of a network, they
> are taking over part of the management of that internet resource. In
> reality the customer's situation is the same as the member's.
> 
>            member ORGANISATION object
>                    /         \
>                  /            \
>             INET(6)NUM        abuse
>             objects           ROLE object
>              /   \
>             /     \
>            /       \        customer ORGANISATION object
>           /         \       /          \
>          /           \     /            \
>        other         INET(6)NUM     customer abuse
>      customers       object         ROLE object
>      INET(6)NUM
>      objects

There is one thing that worries me with the setup: if I understood you
correctly the appropriate (only?) way to remove a specific customer
abuse object (and let the parent LIR handle abuses) is to remove the
customer organisation object. However this would create a strong
dependency between the org and the abuse object: if another object would
be created that relies on the org object (like abuse-c does), you would
link its existence to the presence of an abuse-c - appropriate/wanted or
not.

You could circumvent this limitation by adapting the logic so that not
each org object needs an abuse-c, but somewhere up the tree you need an
abuse-c, even if the 'closest' org hasn't one. Parsing wouldn't get
easier, though.

Best regards,
Gilles


-- 
Fondation RESTENA - DNS-LU
6, rue Coudenhove-Kalergi
L-1359 Luxembourg
tel: (+352) 424409
fax: (+352) 422473