This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Hold time for abused address space - DNSChanger IP's reallocated
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hold time for abused address space - DNSChanger IP's reallocated
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hold time for abused address space - DNSChanger IP's reallocated
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
lists at help.org
lists at help.org
Thu Aug 16 22:32:47 CEST 2012
If I ran a blacklist and said I am posting a list of people who post to mailing lists with signatures that were greater than 6 lines then I don't see that as a problem. If I ran the same list and just claimed those people on the list were "spammers" or "internet abusers" without explaining that they posted a sig with more than 6 lines and I personally defined that as "abuse" then that is a poorly run list. For instance, http://www.spamhaus.org/consumer/definition/ is not a usable definition to be a standard because it is just a collection of vague, undefined terms. Of course all others who are not system admins, including all courts and judges, are all "clueless" and all legal threats are unfounded and anyone who brings up the issue must be spammer.
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hold time for abused address space - DNSChanger IP's reallocated
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hold time for abused address space - DNSChanger IP's reallocated
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]