This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Hold time for abused address space - DNSChanger IP's reallocated
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hold time for abused address space - DNSChanger IP's reallocated
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hold time for abused address space - DNSChanger IP's reallocated
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
lists at help.org
lists at help.org
Thu Aug 16 19:23:34 CEST 2012
>http://www.ripe.net/ripe/groups/wg/anti-abuse I am aware of this but it simply uses another unidentified term "spam." Using one undefined term to define another undefined term is not a standard. As an official spokesperson for a major security company you should know that. This is why most of these abuse groups look like they are run out of someone's Mother's basement. I think some people posting large signatures for a 3-word reply is spam so should they be blacklisted because I have that opinion? Should they be labeled an "abuser" or "spammer" or some other undefined term?
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hold time for abused address space - DNSChanger IP's reallocated
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hold time for abused address space - DNSChanger IP's reallocated
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]