This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Hold time for abused address space - DNSChanger IP's reallocated
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hold time for abused address space - DNSChanger IP's reallocated
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hold time for abused address space - DNSChanger IP's reallocated
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Brian Nisbet
brian.nisbet at heanet.ie
Thu Aug 16 11:17:06 CEST 2012
Heather, Heather Schiller wrote the following on 15/08/2012 20:51: > We've kind of veered away from the topic/questions I had about > reallocating actively abused address space.. but.. Yes indeed. However I'm not sure this is exactly the best place to discuss that matter. Space can be reclaimed and reallocated for a variety of reasons and while space that has been used for abusive behaviour may well require careful handling, I do not believe policies should be based on a subset of cases. Also, please see previous conversations about definition of "abuse" sadly. I think there may well be questions to ask around the reallocation of the space and the speed at which it was done, however I think those questions may be better asked in the NCC Services WG than here. Brian, Co-Chair, Anti-Abuse Working Group
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hold time for abused address space - DNSChanger IP's reallocated
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hold time for abused address space - DNSChanger IP's reallocated
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]