This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] abuse-contact is not going to fly unless we get all the legitimate players adopting it first
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] abuse-contact is not going to fly unless we get all the legitimate players adopting it first
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] abuse-contact is not going to fly unless we get all the legitimate players adopting it first
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Wed Apr 25 09:11:49 CEST 2012
Given that frank gadegast posted something about like 15 of their abuse addresses not working .. thank you but no thanks, I'll take a raincheck :) On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Piotr Strzyzewski <Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl> wrote: > > I have no idea. I have found this in less specific inetnum object: > > inetnum: 89.67.0.0 - 89.74.255.255 > netname: UPC-PL > descr: UPC Polska Sp. z o.o. -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] abuse-contact is not going to fly unless we get all the legitimate players adopting it first
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] abuse-contact is not going to fly unless we get all the legitimate players adopting it first
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]