[anti-abuse-wg] abuse-contact is not going to fly unless we get all the legitimate players adopting it first

On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian
<ops.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> Of course. But as they are careful enough to inform people through
> their whois that they will reject reports going to these other
> addresses ..

This is amazing. So reza had cc'd hostmaster at chello.at in his email -
and I hit reply all.  Now - it seems they don't seem to accept email
at their hostmaster address either.

[cc to chello.at removed]

Your message was not delivered within 2 days and 0 hours.
Host surf0n.vienna.chello.at is not responding.

The following recipients did not receive this message:

    <hostmaster at surf0n.vienna.chello.at>

 Please reply to <Postmaster at chello.at>
 if you feel this message to be in error.

Original-Recipient: RFC822;<hostmaster at chello.at>
Final-Recipient: RFC822; <hostmaster at chello.at>
Action: failed
Status: 4.4.7
Remote-MTA: dns; surf0n.vienna.chello.at
X-Actual-Recipient: RFC822; <hostmaster at surf0n.vienna.chello.at>

-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)