[anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 Discussion Period extended until 7 May 2012 (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)

On 19.04.12 17:37, Adrian wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 03:04:32PM +0200, Tobias Knecht wrote:
> 
> Tobias,
> 
>> I think we should wait and see how the IRT Object will be handled after
>> this proposal is in place and may be there can be a decision about
>> keeping the IRT Object in place or not, or maybe even changing it to
>> it's origin idea. 
> 
> Are the folks using IRT Objects at a larger scale (e.G. TI) included in this discussion?

They are not directly included by us into the discussion, but they are
of course welcome to take part in this discussion.

But please keep in mind that 2011-06 is not about the IRT Object. The
things I mentioned can and will be part of another discussion, maybe
another proposal. And the renaming of the mnt-irt into irt-c is not
essential for this proposal. I was just mentioning it, because this was
talked about in the Task Force and could show up in the RIPE NCC
implementation suggestion.

Thanks,

Tobias

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20120419/25555c7b/attachment.sig>